John Becker for Union Township (Clermont County) Trustee
I’ll be covering this more over the next few months. My platform is outlined at www.BeckerGOP.com. After you’re there, scroll down or click on the issues tab. Please let me know if you’d like to help with my campaign or if you’ll allow me to place a sign on your property. Email me at John@BeckerGOP.com or call my office 24/7 at 513-753-6640 (voice only).
The media has been breathlessly reporting that hospitalizations and deaths are up among the unvaccinated in some parts of the country. Consider these questions:
What age group?
What preexisting conditions?
Are they still counting a Covid diagnosis as a Covid death without regard to the actual cause of death?
Just to put things in perspective, how do current death rates for Covid compare to the seasonal flu prior to Covid?
Is it still true that, for working age people and younger, the risk of being a vehicular fatality is greater than the risk of being a Covid fatality?
Why are opinions contrary to the CDC and WHO continuing to be censored? What is it that they don’t want us to know?
Which is the greater risk? An experimental vaccine and its side-effects? Or the Covid virus for the vast majority of the population?
Given that a large majority of people have been vaccinated and a large unknown number have natural immunity due to prior infection and recovery, how close are we to herd immunity? Why don’t they want us to know?
Am I the only one who doesn’t trust our government?
Private Citizen Affidavits (PCAs)
The September and October 2020 editions of The Becker Report explains much of the detail. The 25 counties that I know of where PCAs have been filed or delivered per ORC 2935.09(D) are: Adams, Allen, Ashtabula, Belmont. Brown, Butler, Clermont, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Highland, Lake, Licking, Lorain, Marion, Miami, Montgomery, Pickaway, Richland, Summit, Union, Warren, Washington, and Wood Counties. Only 63 more to go! The purpose of these is to seek out a judge or prosecutor willing to perform his clear legal duty as described in ORC 2935.10(A) and either issue an arrest warrant or launch an investigation into the charges outlined in the PCA against Governor DeWine.
August 2, 2021 Union Township GOP meeting at the Civic Center at 7 PM.
August 5, 2021 Union Township Police Night Out at Veterans Park at 6 PM.
August 7, 2021 “Free” (paid for by your tax dollars) concert behind the Union Township Civic Center at 8 PM.
August 12, 2021 Union Township Trustees meeting at the Civic Center at 7 PM.
August 14, 2021 “Free” (paid for by your tax dollars) concert behind the Union Township Civic Center at 7 PM.
August 18, 2021 Clermont County GOP meeting at HQ in Batavia at 7 PM?
August 21, 2021 “Free” (paid for by your tax dollars) concert behind the Union Township Civic Center at 8 PM.
August 31, 2021 Friends of Liberty United (FOLU) at Eastside Christian Church at 7 PM?
Becker – Vetted, Tested, and Proven!
“…John Becker, an ‘archconservative’ former state lawmaker from the Cincinnati area…” as described by Cleveland.com (February 2021). “[State Rep. John Becker,] one of Ohio’s most conservative lawmakers…” proclaimed Cleveland.com (October 2020). “Clermont County State Rep. John Becker, one of the most conservative members of the Ohio House…” according to Cleveland.com (August 2019). Becker wins “Sponsor of Liberty” award by the Republican Liberty Caucus of Ohio (October 2018). “Becker has a legitimate claim as the state’s most conservative legislator,” according to The [Cleveland] Plain Dealer (September 2017). “Rep. John Becker, suburban Cincinnati Republican… [holds] the unofficial title as the General Assembly’s most conservative lawmaker,” proclaimed the Columbus Dispatch (September 2015). Becker wins prestigious William Wilberforce Leadership Award (April 2015). “GOP Ohio House freshman Becker is no shrinking violet,” headlined the Columbus Dispatch (December 2014). “Becker…is arguably the most conservative member of the Ohio House,” said The Cincinnati Enquirer (January 2014). Ranked as a top tier “most archconservative” by the Columbus Dispatch (September 2013).
Did this newsletter get sent to you by someone other than me? If so, please let me know at John@BeckerGOP.com and I will add you to my distribution list. That will ensure that you get it in a timelier manner. You may also forward this to your friends. Let me know if you would like to unsubscribe. This issue and back issues are available at: www.BeckerGOP.com.
Disclaimer Nothing in this newsletter constitutes legal advice. I am not an attorney and do not play one on TV. This newsletter is not sanctioned by the GOP, ORP, or any organization, or affiliation. Much of it is simply my opinion. I am fully and solely responsible for my opinion. Although I strive for accuracy, this is not “The Gospel according to John.” Additionally, I don’t necessarily try to be “fair and balanced.” After all, I didn’t get into politics to be a news reporter. My agenda is to influence public policy consistent with Southern Ohio conservative values. For more information on my motivations or how to get involved, see: What is a Central Committee?
Becker Announces for Union Township (Clermont County) Trustee
Submits petition with maximum number of signatures allowed
UNION TOWNSHIP, CLERMONT COUNTY — State Representative John Becker (2013 – 2020) announced his candidacy for Union Township Trustee and submitted his petition to the Clermont County Board of Elections with the maximum number of signatures allowed.
As a State Representative, and since leaving the General Assembly due to term limits, Becker earned a reputation for standing up for the people and against the establishment. He earned multiple accolades for being “one of Ohio’s most conservative legislators” and a champion for liberty. As a trustee, Becker will be combining his eight years of experience in state government with his 30 years of financial expertise in the private sector to focus on controlling expenses, reducing the upward pressure on taxes, and putting the interests of the residents first.
“Property taxes are a problem for many, and for our senior citizens in particular,” Becker said.
His fiscal conservatism and financial expertise are what Union Township needs to right-size government.
Former Representative Becker was on the right side of the Miller Place issue. The overdevelopment threat and environmental impact to the Cincinnati Nature Center, that both incumbent trustees attempted to shove down the throats of the people, was described by Becker as follows:
As 40-year members of the Cincinnati Nature Center, my wife and I were appalled by the callous disregard that both incumbent trustees displayed for the residents of Union Township and for that beautiful sanctuary. In addition to literally standing with our neighbors at the township meetings against both incumbent trustees, we personally donated substantial funds to the Nature Center and the Committee to Protect Avey’s Way. Fortunately, the residents and the Cincinnati Nature Center were able to cobble together enough resources to hire legal counsel to successfully defend against both incumbent trustees.
In addition to overdevelopment in residential areas, Becker is also concerned about Union Township’s debt and its ability to weather the next recession.
When asked about his future political ambitions, Becker responded, “A lot of people want me to run for a higher office – much higher. That’s a possibility in the future. But for now, I am laser focused on Union Township and earning the vote of the people. That’s where my interests are and my commitment is.”
Why Not Becker for Governor?
If not Becker, then…?
Well, let’s start with the fact that I’ll take almost anybody over Governor DeWine. Furthermore, I will never vote for Mike DeWine again, for any office – ever. If the field is split and Governor DeWine wins the primary election, I will consider an independent, a write-in candidate, or I simply will not vote in that race in the general election. Regarding a “Becker for Governor” campaign, I repeatedly said that if nobody of substance steps up to run for Governor, I will do it. That was my way of deferring to the “Buckley Doctrine.”
Well, that’s a matter of opinion and I can offer mine based on my experience:
Politically engaged since 1993.
Worked on multiple political campaigns.
Attended multiple campaign schools.
Elected multiple times to the office of Republican State Central Committee (2004 – 2012).
Elected multiple times to the office of State Representative (2013 – 2020).
There’s an old axiom in politics: “The abundance of money doesn’t guarantee victory, but the absence of money guarantees defeat.”
Why is money important? Isn’t a strong Facebook following and a slick website enough?
To be viable, a candidate for statewide office needs to be able to check a number of boxes. For example:
Statewide name ID.
Ability to assemble a statewide professional campaign staff.
Ability to hire political consulting firms for polling, messaging, targeting voters, direct mail, phone banks, etc.
Ability to rapidly travel the state.
Ability to purchase production and substantial television and radio time in every media market.
Competency to run a statewide campaign and to govern if elected.
A strong following of loyal supporters.
All of that costs many millions of dollars. A viable candidate wouldn’t need to be able to outspend Governor DeWine, but would need enough money to reach every Republican voter multiple times and in multiple ways. These are among the reasons I will not be running for governor in 2022.
Is Jim Renacci the “most conservative viable candidate” to defeat Governor DeWine?
Well, at the present time, the short answer is yes. Frankly, it’s a no-brainer. However, other (perhaps more conservative and viable) candidates might still step up, but that is becoming increasingly unlikely.
It is important to note that Jim Renacci has agreed to drop out of the race and support any candidate who is more viable (electable) than he is. I respect that. Therefore, unless or until that happens, Jim Renacci is the candidate who meets the “Buckley Doctrine.”
What about Lieutenant Governor (LG)?
Similarly to a presidential candidate picking a VP, a gubernatorial candidate must also make a wise choice for LG. The traditional wisdom is so-called “balancing the ticket.” That means that the candidate will pick somebody that fills in the gaps in any perceived policy weaknesses or simply for geographic or demographic concerns. Let’s take Jim Renacci for example: He is a white Catholic man from Northeastern Ohio. Policy issues aside, “balancing the ticket” would dictate that he select a non-Catholic woman of color from Southwestern Ohio. However, demographic and regional “balancing” are of dubious importance to Republican primary voters. Those voters are more interested in policy issues and Jim Renacci is widely perceived to be something less than a fire-breathing right-winger.
Why is it important for Jim Renacci to select a “fire-breathing right-winger” for LG?
Well, in his case, it’s imperative. His “charisma” isn’t going to be enough to drive turnout and get enough conservative Republicans out to vote. Jim Renacci has been on the defensive regarding his congressional voting record. That gives conservatives pause, and understandably so.
Therefore, it is absolutely imperative that he select an LG candidate who can throw “red meat” to the crowds and colorfully explain why Mike DeWine is more popular amongst Democrats than Republicans.
His LG choice will need to be the person who can deliver conservatives to Team Renacci.
What if Jim Renacci were to pick a so-called “moderate” for LG?
Governor DeWine will have unlimited funds to marginalize and bury Jim Renacci. If that happens, conservatives will be disenchanted and disengaged in the race. That will stifle turnout amongst conservatives and many Democrats are likely to crossover and vote in the Republican primary for Governor DeWine. What will Jim Renacci’s plan be to fire up the conservative base of the party and get them excited about him?
It was a eureka moment with Jim Renacci on June 29, 2021
After writing all of the above, I attended two meetings on June 29th where Jim Renacci was the keynote speaker. One of them was a small group meeting by invitation only. I was pleasantly surprised by the new things I learned about him. The details of what I learned are less important than the impression I walked away with. Just to be flat-out honest here, my support for Jim Renacci had more to do with him being able to beat Governor DeWine than Renacci’s policies or conservative credentials. That said, the only thing that ever gave me pause was his voting record. He explained it all to my satisfaction. As a former legislator, I am able to relate to his explanations from that unique perspective.
After considering past conversations with him and watching him address tough questions, I’m now convinced that Jim Renacci is the real deal. He is a true fiscal conservative and a constitutionalist. He is honest and a straight shooter. He is pro-life and supports gun owner’s rights. What’s not to like here?
Private Citizen Affidavits (PCAs)
The September and October 2020 editions of The Becker Report explains much of the detail. The 25 counties that I know of where PCAs have been filed or delivered per ORC 2935.09(D) are: Adams, Allen, Ashtabula, Belmont. Brown, Butler, Clermont, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Highland, Lake, Licking, Lorain, Marion, Miami, Montgomery, Pickaway, Richland, Summit, Union, Warren, Washington, and Wood Counties. Only 63 more to go! The purpose of these is to seek out a judge or prosecutor willing to perform his clear legal duty as described in ORC 2935.10(A) and either issue an arrest warrant or launch an investigation into the charges outlined in the PCA against Governor DeWine.
July 31, 2021 “Free” (paid for by your tax dollars) concert behind the Union Township Civic Center at 8 PM.
Becker – Vetted, Tested, and Proven!
“…John Becker, an ‘archconservative’ former state lawmaker from the Cincinnati area…” as described by Cleveland.com (February 2021). “[State Rep. John Becker,] one of Ohio’s most conservative lawmakers…” proclaimed Cleveland.com (October 2020). “Clermont County State Rep. John Becker, one of the most conservative members of the Ohio House…” according to Cleveland.com (August 2019). Becker wins “Sponsor of Liberty” award by the Republican Liberty Caucus of Ohio (October 2018). “Becker has a legitimate claim as the state’s most conservative legislator,” according to The [Cleveland] Plain Dealer (September 2017). “Rep. John Becker, suburban Cincinnati Republican… [holds] the unofficial title as the General Assembly’s most conservative lawmaker,” proclaimed the Columbus Dispatch (September 2015). Becker wins prestigious William Wilberforce Leadership Award (April 2015). “GOP Ohio House freshman Becker is no shrinking violet,” headlined the Columbus Dispatch (December 2014). “Becker…is arguably the most conservative member of the Ohio House,” said The Cincinnati Enquirer (January 2014). Ranked as a top tier “most archconservative” by the Columbus Dispatch (September 2013).
Did this newsletter get sent to you by someone other than me? If so, please let me know at John@BeckerGOP.com and I will add you to my distribution list. That will ensure that you get it in a timelier manner. You may also forward this to your friends. Let me know if you would like to unsubscribe. This issue and back issues are available at: www.BeckerGOP.com.
Disclaimer Nothing in this newsletter constitutes legal advice. I am not an attorney and do not play one on TV. This newsletter is not sanctioned by the GOP, ORP, or any organization, or affiliation. Much of it is simply my opinion. I am fully and solely responsible for my opinion. Although I strive for accuracy, this is not “The Gospel according to John.” Additionally, I don’t necessarily try to be “fair and balanced.” After all, I didn’t get into politics to be a news reporter. My agenda is to influence public policy consistent with Southern Ohio conservative values. For more information on my motivations or how to get involved, see: What is a Central Committee?
Unfortunately, it was malpractice. After the extensive March issue, more evidence supporting the science AGAINST mask mandates and business restrictions has emerged and continues to grow. Additionally, there is no correlation between virus spread and lockdowns or masks. Other than the Trump vaccine, all government action has been a fraud.
In summary, the Trump vaccine was the only initiative that proved to be effective in stopping Covid. All of the damaging business restrictions and humiliating mask mandates were simply government “having to do something.”
Why does the CDC claim that masks are effective?
This is probably best answered by the old saying, “figures don’t lie but liars do figure.” Only a statistician can claim (with a straight face) that mask wearing is effective. Journalists simply report what the CDC tells them. The CDC study shows that mask wearing is a “significant” deterrent to the spread of Covid. “Significant” is a statistical term and does not necessarily mean that it’s consequential, meaningful, or important to people’s everyday lives. That same CDC study shows that the efficacy rate is at most, only 1.8 percent. The efficacy of lockdowns are also in this same range. Only a statistician can claim (with a straight face) that 1.8 percent is significant. In terms of daily living, it is not. It is simply intellectually dishonest to make that claim. Consider the health concerns and risks of wearing masks and the catastrophic results of lockdowns.
Therefore, mask mandates and lockdowns, based on a less than two percent efficacy, is abject incompetence that only government is capable of.
By making mask-wearing recommendations and policies for the general public, or by expressly condoning the practice, governments have both ignored the scientific evidence and done the opposite of following the precautionary principle. In an absence of knowledge, governments should not make policies that have a hypothetical potential to cause harm. The government has an onus barrier before it instigates a broad social-engineering intervention, or allows corporations to exploit fear-based sentiments. Furthermore, individuals should know that there is no known benefit arising from wearing a mask in a viral respiratory illness epidemic, and that scientific studies have shown that any benefit must be residually small, compared to other and determinative factors.
“The growth in reported case incidence (and mortality) was, overall, virtually indistinguishable in counties with and without mask mandates.”
“While many facts were unknown when the disease first took hold in the United States, a great deal of the evidence was quite clear by May.”
“As the public health emergency abates, Congress, the media, and the American public should heavily scrutinize the agency’s procedures and practices.”
“Unfortunately, throughout the pandemic, scientific facts have meant little. While many facts were unknown when the disease first took hold in the United States, a great deal of the evidence was quite clear by May.” “Government officials and the American people depend on legitimate scientific study, and they have shown extraordinary deference to the CDC throughout the past year. This deference rests on the presumption that the agency’s recommendations to shutter businesses, close schools, restrict public worship, and enforce mask mandates have a solid basis in science.”
“That confidence, in many instances, appears to have been misplaced. As the public health emergency abates, Congress, the media, and the American public should heavily scrutinize the agency’s procedures and practices.”
“If the reporting of these deaths followed the CDC guidebook from 2003, the number of Covid deaths would have been 9,684. However, utilizing this new reporting and classification method that exclusively applied to Covid-19, the number of deaths is 161,392.”
“The government’s ‘near complete’ lack of guidance and research on treatment options — ‘apart from vaccines’ — is ‘unconscionable,’ said University of Wisconsin critical care specialist Dr. Pierre Kory.”
According to Baruch Vainshelboim, “The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks.”
“In fact, it is not unreasonable at this time to conclude that surgical and cloth masks, used as they currently are, have absolutely no impact on controlling the transmission of Covid-19 virus, and current evidence implies that face masks can be actually harmful.”
“Our view is that masks as they are worn now, and the masks that are in use, offer zero protection. They can be viewed as ineffective while others consider them as being better than nothing but without evidence to support that view.”
“In sum, when we look at the science, there is emerging and troubling evidence of harms from mask use in the absence of any benefits.”
All legitimate policy scholars today should be reexamining the policies that have severely harmed America’s children and families, while failing to save the elderly. Numerous studies, including one from Stanford University’s infectious disease scientists and epidemiologists Benavid, Oh, Bhattacharya, and Ioannides have shown that the mitigating impact of the extraordinary measures used in almost every state was small at best—and usually harmful. President Biden himself openly admitted the lack of efficacy of these measures in his January 22 speech to the nation: “There is nothing we can do,” he said, “to change the trajectory of the pandemic in the next several months.”
Besides their limited value in containing the virus, lockdown policies have been extraordinarily harmful. The harms to children of suspending in-person schooling are dramatic, including poor learning, school dropouts, social isolation, and suicidal ideation, most of which are far worse for lower income groups. A recent study confirms that up to 78 percent of cancers were never detected due to missed screening over a three-month period. If one extrapolates to the entire country, 750,000 to over a million new cancer cases over a nine-month period will have gone undetected. That health disaster adds to missed critical surgeries, delayed presentations of pediatric illnesses, heart attack and stroke patients too afraid to go to the hospital, and others—all well documented.
Beyond hospital care, the CDC reported four-fold increases in depression, three-fold increases in anxiety symptoms, and a doubling of suicidal ideation, particularly among young adults after the first few months of lockdowns, echoing American Medical Association reports of drug overdoses and suicides. Domestic and child abuse have been skyrocketing due to the isolation and loss of jobs. Given that many schools have been closed, hundreds of thousands of abuse cases have gone unreported, since schools are commonly where abuse is noticed. Finally, the unemployment shock from lockdowns, according to a recent National Bureau of Economic Research study, will generate a three percent increase in the mortality rate and a 0.5 percent drop in life expectancy over the next 15 years, disproportionately affecting African-Americans and women. That translates into what the study refers to as a “staggering” 890,000 additional U.S. deaths.
And sadly, just as in Galileo’s time, the root of our problem lies in “the experts” and vested academic interests. At many universities—which are supposed to be America’s centers for critical thinking—those with views contrary to those of “the experts” currently in power find themselves intimidated. Many have become afraid to speak up.
That is the goal of public health policy—to minimize all harms, not simply to stop a virus at all costs.
Dr. Scott Atlas
Regarding universal masks, 38 states have implemented mask mandates, most of them since at least the summer, with almost all the rest having mandates in their major cities. Widespread, general population mask usage has shown little empirical utility in terms of preventing cases, even though citing or describing evidence against their utility has been censored. Denmark also performed a randomized controlled study that showed that widespread mask usage had only minimal impact.
Those who say it is unethical, even dangerous, to question broad population mask mandates must also explain why many top infectious disease scientists and public health organizations question the efficacy of general population masking. Tom Jefferson and Carl Heneghan of the University of Oxford’s Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, for instance, wrote that “despite two decades of pandemic preparedness, there is considerable uncertainty as to the value of wearing masks.” Oxford epidemiologist Sunetra Gupta says there is no need for masks unless one is elderly or high risk. Stanford’s Jay Bhattacharya has said that “mask mandates are not supported by the scientific data. . . . There is no scientific evidence that mask mandates work to slow the spread of the disease.”
Throughout this pandemic, the WHO’s “Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19” has included the following statement: “At present, there is no direct evidence (from studies on COVID-19 and in healthy people in the community) on the effectiveness of universal masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including COVID-19.”
Dr. Atlas concluded as follows:
With social media acting as the arbiter of allowable discussion, and with continued censorship and cancellation of those with views challenging the “accepted narrative,” the United States is on the verge of losing its cherished freedoms. It is not at all clear whether our democratic republic will survive—but it is clear it will not survive unless more people begin to step up in defense of freedom of thought and speech.
“Perhaps Fauci’s most notable flip-flop has been on the efficacy of masks, saying in March [2020] that there was “no reason” to wear a mask. By April [2020], he joined the chorus of doctors and health agencies encouraging the use of face masks.”
He also downplayed asymptomatic transmission on Jan. 28, saying what “people need to realize” is that in “all the history” of respiratory-borne viruses, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. By August, Fauci did a complete 180, saying asymptomatic cases were a driving factor in the community spread of COVID-19 despite a WHO admission that more evidence was needed to make this determination. In late August, researchers from Southern Medical University in Guangzhou concluded that “asymptomatic cases were least likely to infect their close contacts.”
Over the summer, Fauci dismissed hydroxychloroquine as a treatment after Trump touted the drug, saying research showed that it was not “effective.” Trump was subsequently met with condemnation from the press and others. In November, however, a peer-reviewed study, which will be published in the International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, found that there were 84% fewer hospitalizations with patients who were given a drug cocktail containing hydroxychloroquine.
The existing scientific evidences challenge the safety and efficacy of wearing facemask as preventive intervention for COVID-19. The data suggest that both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to block human-to-human transmission of viral and infectious disease such SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, supporting against the usage of facemasks. Wearing facemasks has been demonstrated to have substantial adverse physiological and psychological effects. These include hypoxia, hypercapnia, shortness of breath, increased acidity and toxicity, activation of fear and stress response, rise in stress hormones, immunosuppression, fatigue, headaches, decline in cognitive performance, predisposition for viral and infectious illnesses, chronic stress, anxiety and depression. Long-term consequences of wearing facemask can cause health deterioration, developing and progression of chronic diseases and premature death. Governments, policy makers and health organizations should utilize prosper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks, when the latter is considered as preventive intervention for public health.
GreenMedInfo has additional links to face mask research. See these 35 abstracts here.
Although I’ve made no attempt to verify or refute the claims in this article, it makes for a very interesting read:
18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a Covid Vaccine CENSORED: It’s interesting to note that the Facebook Nazis screwed up again by claiming the author said things that he didn’t say. For example, the Facebook Nazis state that the author’s information is false because “The CDC Did NOT Admit That Only 6% Of Deaths In COVID Toll Were From COVID-19.” Well, the author never said that. He said, according to the CDC, “only 6% of the deaths being attributed to covid are instances where covid seems to be the only issue at hand.” This is what the CDC reported. Only 6% of Covid deaths are exclusively from Covid. And now the CDC is saying, “For over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate.” Therefore, I deem the Facebook Nazi so-called “fact-checkers” as wrong again. This also reminds me of when the Facebook Nazi so-called “fact checkers” falsely flagged this vaping video as smoke.
The September and October 2020 editions of The Becker Report explains much of the detail. The 25 counties that I know of where PCAs have been filed or delivered per ORC 2935.09(D) are: Adams, Allen, Ashtabula, Belmont. Brown, Butler, Clermont, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Highland, Lake, Licking, Lorain, Marion, Miami, Montgomery, Pickaway, Richland, Summit, Union, Warren, Washington, and Wood Counties. Only 63 more to go! The purpose of these is to seek out a judge or prosecutor willing to perform his clear legal duty as described in ORC 2935.10(A) and either issue an arrest warrant or launch an investigation into the charges outlined in the PCA against Governor DeWine.
“…John Becker, an ‘archconservative’ former state lawmaker from the Cincinnati area…” as described by Cleveland.com (February 2021). “[State Rep. John Becker,] one of Ohio’s most conservative lawmakers…” proclaimed Cleveland.com (October 2020). “Clermont County State Rep. John Becker, one of the most conservative members of the Ohio House…” according to Cleveland.com (August 2019). Becker wins “Sponsor of Liberty” award by the Republican Liberty Caucus of Ohio (October 2018). “Becker has a legitimate claim as the state’s most conservative legislator,” according to The [Cleveland] Plain Dealer (September 2017). “Rep. John Becker, suburban Cincinnati Republican… [holds] the unofficial title as the General Assembly’s most conservative lawmaker,” proclaimed the Columbus Dispatch (September 2015). Becker wins prestigious William Wilberforce Leadership Award (April 2015). “GOP Ohio House freshman Becker is no shrinking violet,” headlined the Columbus Dispatch (December 2014). “Becker…is arguably the most conservative member of the Ohio House,” said The Cincinnati Enquirer (January 2014). Ranked as a top tier “most archconservative” by the Columbus Dispatch (September 2013).
Did this newsletter get sent to you by someone other than me? If so, please let me know at John@BeckerGOP.com and I will add you to my distribution list. That will ensure that you get it in a timelier manner. You may also forward this to your friends. Let me know if you would like to unsubscribe. This issue and back issues are available at: www.BeckerGOP.com.
Disclaimer Nothing in this newsletter constitutes legal advice. I am not an attorney and do not play one on TV. This newsletter is not sanctioned by the GOP, ORP, or any organization, or affiliation. Much of it is simply my opinion. I am fully and solely responsible for my opinion. Although I strive for accuracy, this is not “The Gospel according to John.” Additionally, I don’t necessarily try to be “fair and balanced.” After all, I didn’t get into politics to be a news reporter. My agenda is to influence public policy consistent with Southern Ohio conservative values. For more information on my motivations or how to get involved, see: What is a Central Committee?
We get a lot of lip service out of the Ohio General Assembly about how they want to lift Governor DeWine’s boot off of the throat of Ohio’s economy and free the people of his unlawful mandates and business restrictions. They will quickly point to SB 22 and claim that the problem is solved. Well, it is not solved. SB 22 won’t become law until late June. It is unknown what, if any, action that the General Assembly will take at that time. Keep in mind that the General Assembly might be on summer recess by then. Additionally, we don’t know if SB 22 will survive a likely court challenge. It is very possible that a court will put a stay on SB 22 and prevent its enforcement until it works it’s way through the judicial system.
Ohio’s Biennium Budgets are the Answer
Ohio’s main operating budget is written every two years and funds most of the state government as well as local subdivisions (schools, municipalities, counties, townships, etc.) and various organizations. For this biennium, the main operating budget is known as HB 110. The procedure is as follows:
The governor submits a budget proposal to the House Finance Committee. It becomes the Ohio House Finance Chairman’s budget.
The House Finance Committee adds, deletes, and tweaks per their discretion and with the approval of House leadership.
All members of the House have the opportunity to submit amendments for the Chairman’s consideration.
The Finance Committee Chairman and the Speaker of the House finalize the bill and bring it to the House floor for consideration.
Upon passage, it goes to the Ohio Senate Finance Committee for consideration.
The Senate Finance Committee adds, deletes, and tweaks per their discretion and with the approval of Senate leadership.
Every Senator has the opportunity to submit amendments for the Chairman’s consideration.
The Finance Committee Chairman and the Senate President finalize the bill and bring it to the Senate floor for consideration.
Upon passage, the budget bill is returned to the House for consideration.
Although the House could accept all of the Senate’s changes, they routinely reject the changes and send the bill to conference committee to work out the differences.
The conference committee is a very small group and is typically the House and Senate Chairmen and Vice Chairmen. Deals get made (horse trading) and the conferees return the bill to both chambers (House and Senate) for a final up or down vote. No amendments can be considered on a bill reported out by a conference committee.
Upon passage by both chambers, the bill goes to the governor for his consideration.
The governor could sign it as is, line item veto sections of it, or veto the entire bill. The Ohio Constitution requires that the budget bill be signed into law by June 30th of each odd numbered year (2021).
The Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (BWC) and the Ohio Industrial Commission (OIC) have there own separate budgets and goes through the same or similar process as the main operating budget. More information is here. The BWC budget is HB 75 and the IOC budget is HB 76.
Opportunity – Hold the Funding Hostage for the Weaponized State Agencies
The main operating budget (HB 110) is currently in step #6 as described above. Any State Senator could submit an amendment to fully or partially defund state agencies that Governor DeWine has weaponized against businesses and the people. That would include the Department of Health (ODH) and the Division of Liquor Control. The Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (BWC) budget (HB 75) is currently in step #2 above. Any State Representative could submit an amendment to fully or partially defund BWC. The Division of Liquor Control and BWC are the agencies that Governor DeWine has weaponized to harass businesses. Regarding the line item veto, the governor could delete all of the funding but can’t change the amount of the funding. This is where the horse trading comes in and the deals get made.
Defunding will force Governor DeWine to the table to negotiate the lifting of his draconian mandates and business restrictions in exchange for funding. And that folks, is how you play hardball.
State Representative John Becker (2013 – 2020)
Additionally, if you don’t like the liberal indoctrination happening in our public schools, HB 110 includes another enormous increase in school funding too.
In summary:
HB 110 is in the Senate Finance Committee and controls the funding for the Ohio Department of Health and the Division of Liquor Control.
All State Representatives and State Senators have the same email construct. Only the district number is different. Our 33 Senators are SD01@OhioSenate.gov through SD33@OhioSenate.gov. They can also be reached by LastNameOfSenator@OhioSenate.gov. Our 99 State Representatives are Rep01@OhioHouse.gov through Rep99@OhioHouse.gov. Prior to term limits catching up with me, mine had been Rep65@OhioHouse.gov. It now belongs to Representative Schmidt.
In your communications, always be polite and respectful (but don’t hesitate to be forceful and firm). For example, address them as Dear Speaker Cupp, Dear Senate President Huffman, Dear Representative, Dear Senator, the Honorable Senator…, or Honorable Representative…
You know what to expect – Lip Service is Easy and Cheap
In Columbus, towers of courage are few and far between. As you know, you can expect stonewalling and creative BS from your elected officials. (It’s a learned skill.) They’ll likely tell you why the attempt won’t be successful or why it isn’t necessary. They want you to believe that they are working hard for you while doing next to nothing to “rock the boat.”
The reason for this is that they want to be “team players” in Columbus to retain or obtain political favors, including funding, while providing lip service to their constituents. Often times, their public lip service is the polar opposite of what they argue for behind closed doors. None of this is illegal, but all of it is corrupt.
STATE REPRESENTATIVE JOHN BECKER (2013 – 2020)
Regardless, if enough people apply enough pressure, results will materialize.
Private Citizen Affidavits (PCAs)
The September and October 2020 editions of The Becker Report explains much of the detail. The 25 counties that I know of where PCAs have been filed or delivered per ORC 2935.09(D) are: Adams, Allen, Ashtabula, Belmont. Brown, Butler, Clermont, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Highland, Lake, Licking, Lorain, Marion, Miami, Montgomery, Pickaway, Richland, Summit, Union, Warren, Washington, and Wood Counties. Only 63 more to go! The purpose of these is to seek out a judge or prosecutor willing to perform his clear legal duty as described in ORC 2935.10(A) and either issue an arrest warrant or launch an investigation into the charges outlined in the PCA against Governor DeWine.
“…John Becker, an ‘archconservative’ former state lawmaker from the Cincinnati area…” as described by Cleveland.com (February 2021). “[State Rep. John Becker,] one of Ohio’s most conservative lawmakers…” proclaimed Cleveland.com (October 2020). “Clermont County State Rep. John Becker, one of the most conservative members of the Ohio House…” according to Cleveland.com (August 2019). Becker wins “Sponsor of Liberty” award by the Republican Liberty Caucus of Ohio (October 2018). “Becker has a legitimate claim as the state’s most conservative legislator,” according to The [Cleveland] Plain Dealer (September 2017). “Rep. John Becker, suburban Cincinnati Republican… [holds] the unofficial title as the General Assembly’s most conservative lawmaker,” proclaimed the Columbus Dispatch (September 2015). Becker wins prestigious William Wilberforce Leadership Award (April 2015). “GOP Ohio House freshman Becker is no shrinking violet,” headlined the Columbus Dispatch (December 2014). “Becker…is arguably the most conservative member of the Ohio House,” said The Cincinnati Enquirer (January 2014). Ranked as a top tier “most archconservative” by the Columbus Dispatch (September 2013).
Did this newsletter get sent to you by someone other than me? If so, please let me know at John@BeckerGOP.com and I will add you to my distribution list. That will ensure that you get it in a timelier manner. You may also forward this to your friends. Let me know if you would like to unsubscribe. This issue and back issues are available at: www.BeckerGOP.com.
Disclaimer Nothing in this newsletter constitutes legal advice. I am not an attorney and do not play one on TV. This newsletter is not sanctioned by the GOP, ORP, or any organization, or affiliation. Much of it is simply my opinion. I am fully and solely responsible for my opinion. Although I strive for accuracy, this is not “The Gospel according to John.” Additionally, I don’t necessarily try to be “fair and balanced.” After all, I didn’t get into politics to be a news reporter. My agenda is to influence public policy consistent with Southern Ohio conservative values. For more information on my motivations or how to get involved, see: What is a Central Committee?
Is COVID-19 a Fraud? No, but the logic and lack of science behind the governing decisions sure are.
What? Only six (6) percent of so-called Covid deaths are uniquely Covid? And the other 94 percent???
Consider that the CDC reports that only six (6) percent of so-called Covid deaths are unique to Covid. The other 94 percent of so-called Covid deaths include nearly four additional causes. According to the CDC, “For 6% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 3.8 additional conditions or causes per death.” Therefore, we know with certainty that Covid could be the primary, secondary, or tertiary cause of death in 94 percent of the so-called Covid deaths. What is the breakdown of primary, secondary, or tertiary for those 94 percent? That information is readily available from the hospitals and insurance companies but does not seem to be publicly available. Why not? What is it that they don’t want us to know? Could it be that 94 percent of the so-called Covid deaths are people who died WITH Covid rather than OF Covid? (Note: During the 1990s, I worked in the medical insurance business. I did reporting and analysis of ICD-9 diagnostic codes routinely for the clinicians. Those diagnostic codes identified medical conditions as primary, secondary, or tertiary. Back in my old job, I could have quickly and easily run a report to get that information.)
Are Masks Effective? No, but many find them humiliating, insulting, offensive, and degrading.
Mask mandates reduced case growth between zero and 1.8 percent, and COVID death rates by .7 and 1.9 percent, with an increase in deaths 21-40 days after the mandate went into effect. Indoor dining bans decreased case growth between .1 and .4 percent with an increase in cases in four time periods the bans were implemented. Restaurant bans were associated with a slight growth in COVID mortality.
Disposable medical masks (also known as surgical masks) are loose-fitting devices that were designed to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds, and to protect the wearer against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids. There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.
From the Daily Mail: Face masks in public places are not necessary, based on all the current evidence,’ said Coen Berends, spokesman for the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. ‘There is no benefit and there may even be negative impact. “The evidence for them is contradictory. In general, we think you must be careful with face masks because they can give a false sense of security. People think they’re immune from disease or stop social distancing. That is very negative.” “The World Health Organization has also been skeptical, warning that ‘widespread use of masks by healthy people in the community setting is not yet supported by high-quality or direct scientific evidence.”
Yeah, that’s because all of the studies show mask efficacy to be negligible.
What happened when Texas repealed their mask mandate? According to this National Review article: “Since ending the statewide mask mandate, Texas rate of new cases per day has dropped, as has the number of active cases, while the rate of deaths per day increased slightly.”
The following are my conclusions. They are based on the analysis of the experts : For a healthy person, wearing a mask does nothing to protect others and is potentially harmful to self. That said, a properly fit N-95 offers good protection against viruses for the person wearing it. For symptomatic (coughing) people, wearing a mask is prudent and there is a very slim chance that it may reduce some virus expulsion. The studies show a less than two percent efficacy. For some (Governor DeWine), wearing a mask is about freedom. For others, wearing a mask promotes fear. Many feel that any requirement to wear a mask is offensive, humiliating, degrading, and a violation of civil liberties. The science shows that the effectiveness of mask mandates are negligible and laughable. That also explains why only government could create such an idiotic policy. And then, political leaders wonder why we think they’re so stupid. As a final thought on masks, my research has concluded that they are just as effective as a training bra on a prepubescent girl. It’s for social purposes. Still having doubts? Watch this three minute video of Dr. Ted Noel.
Are Business Restrictions Effective?
According to this story in The Epoch Times, “Research Suggests Lockdowns Didn’t Reduce COVID Deaths.“ “A review of data from 87 regions worldwide found that in about 98 percent of the comparisons, there was no evidence that lockdowns reduced the number of COVID-19 deaths.” “If the lockdowns saved millions of lives, most people would feel they could be justified… Increasingly, research is confirming that lockdowns, in fact, were largely ineffective in reducing deaths from COVID-19.” According to Newsweek, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor at Stanford University Medical School, recently said that COVID-19 lockdowns are the “biggest public health mistake we’ve ever made…The harm to people is catastrophic.“ From Nature.com: “In conclusion, using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home.” The Great Barrington Declaration: “Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health”, states the declaration. “Keeping the measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed…our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.” Do lockdowns have a successful history against infectious diseases? “Basic epidemiological theory indicates that lockdowns do not reduce the total number of cases in the long run and have never in history led to the eradication of a disease. At best, lockdowns delay the increase of cases for a finite period and at great cost.” This same document has an extensive Q&A for those wanting more information. If all of that is not enough, consider this article from the Associated Press: Virus tolls similar despite governors’ contrasting actions
Nearly a year after California Gov. Gavin Newsom ordered the nation’s first statewide shutdown because of the coronavirus, masks remain mandated, indoor dining and other activities are significantly limited, and Disneyland remains closed.
By contrast, Florida has no statewide restrictions. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis has prohibited municipalities from fining people who refuse to wear masks. And Disney World has been open since July.
Despite their differing approaches, California and Florida have experienced almost identical outcomes in COVID-19 case rates.
I’m not a statistician and I’m thinking back to my college probability classes, but I’m going to attempt to explain this in simple terms: When you consider probabilities of Event A, Event B, and Event C all happening, that is a calculable probability given accurate data. Start with a universe of nearly 12 million people (Ohio’s population). Considering the size of the population relative to the number of infected people; the odds of an asymptomatic person being infected are slim. Furthermore, the odds of that person spreading it are slimmer. Hence, the DeWine business restrictions and mask requirements are simply absurd. Conclusion: With an efficacy rate of less than two percent, mask requirements and business restrictions are a result of epic governmental incompetence.
Ohio Coronavirus Portal
At first glance, Ohio’s portal and associated dashboard displays no information that has any relevance. It shows a lot of cumulative data designed to elicit fear and justify incompetent governing. Digging into the key metrics shows that Covid hospitalizations are near zero percent throughout Ohio. But Governor DeWine wants you to focus on the cumulative number of cases (which includes “probable cases”). That number exceeds 1 million. I have a few questions regarding those million cases:
How many are false positives?
How many are current cases? Answer: The 21 day average of reported and “probable” cases is 1,617 out of 11.7 million people. That’s 0.01 percent of Ohio’s population. In other words, one one-hundredth of one percent.
How many are asymptomatic?
How many have mild symptoms?
How many are at home on the couch?
Governor DeWine also wants you to focus on the cumulative number of so-called Covid deaths. As of this writing, that number is 18,609.
How many of those deaths are with Covid rather than from Covid?
How many of them are embellished due to the Medicare 20 percent financial incentive?
How many of them were in nursing homes or prisons?
52 percent of those deaths are people over 80 years old.
79 (52+27) percent of those deaths are people over 70 years old.
93 (52+27+14) percent of those deaths are people over 60 years old.
And the survival rate for Covid victims by age band:
80+ is 81.3 percent
70-79 is 92.8 percent
60-69 is 97.8 percent
50-59 is 99.4 percent
40-49 is 99.8 percent
30-39 is 99.9 percent
20-29 is virtually 100 percent
0-19 is virtually 100 percent
Data is as of March 30, 2021 and extracted from Coronavirus.Ohio.gov
Based on the statistics, we know that the working age population (at least for those under age 60) is at a greater risk of being a traffic accident fatality rather than a Covid death.Therefore, does all of this justify the draconian measures that Governor DeWine has taken against the economy and against the people of Ohio?
Are the Vaccines Experimental?
Yes. The COVID-19 vaccines are not yet approved by the FDA. The FDA has given them “Emergency Use Authorization” (EUA) only. According to the FDA, “Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.”
Multiple news outlets including the Associated Press for example, describe the EUA as follows: “During a health crisis, the FDA can loosen its normal scientific standards to allow emergency use of experimental drugs, devices, vaccines and other medical products. The first vaccines to get the provisional green light in the U.S. are almost certain to be made available under this process, known as emergency use authorization.” It’s interesting to note that according to Life Site News, “Nearly half of healthcare workers have declined coronavirus shots.”
Were any of the vaccines developed by using the tissue of aborted babies or “fetal cell lines”?
The answer to this question depends on the exact wording of the question. Yes. “Fetal cell lines” were used to develop the AstraZeneca and the Johnson and Johnson vaccines. The babies were originally killed 50 years ago and their corpses have been used in scientific research ever since. However, the manufacturers claim that their vaccines contain no fetal tissue or fetal cells. According to this USAToday article, “When it comes to the COVID-19 vaccines, at least five candidates undergoing clinical trials use fetal-derived cell lines: from China’s CanSino Biologics, the University of Oxford partnered with AstraZeneca, Janssen (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), the University of Pittsburgh and California-based ImmunityBio.”
Dr. William Moss, executive director of the International Vaccine Access Center at Johns Hopkins, said the AstraZeneca vaccine is derived from an adenovirus grown in a kidney cell line that came from a fetus aborted in 1972, but does not contain fetal cells itself. To be clear, he said, the cell line did not grow directly in fetal tissue. Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at Johns Hopkins, said the Johnson and Johnson vaccine is manufactured similarly and also does not contain fetal cells. Monkeys were used in research and safety testing of the vaccines.
Is it true that deaths from all causes in 2020 are about the same as 2019?
I kept hearing that and presented the question to the Facebook community. I asked for links to data to verify or refute the claim. After several hours of research, I pieced together enough data to prove the statement false. Then I started looking for affirmation of my conclusion. I’m no fan of Snopes, but before reading their analysis, I came to the same conclusion and, interestingly, in the same way. That methodology is here. Current CDC mortality reports for 2020, show that the deaths per 100,000 population in the US has increased by about 17 percent over 2019. Although Covid is clearly a major factor, it is unclear to what degree. (Deaths from suicide and drug overdoses due to government policy of isolation and depression are also significant factors.) Based on my findings, I anticipate a substantial drop in the death rate in 2021 and 2022 to below 2019 levels. This is because the would-be 2021 and 2022 deaths have accelerated into 2020 and 2021.
Private Citizen Affidavits (PCAs)
The September and October 2020 editions of The Becker Report explains much of the detail. The 25 counties that I know of where PCAs have been filed or delivered per ORC 2935.09(D) are: Adams, Allen, Ashtabula, Belmont. Brown, Butler, Clermont, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Highland, Lake, Licking, Lorain, Marion, Miami, Montgomery, Pickaway, Richland, Summit, Union, Warren, Washington, and Wood Counties. Only 63 more to go! The purpose of these is to seek out a judge or prosecutor willing to perform his clear legal duty as described in ORC 2935.10(A) and either issue an arrest warrant or launch an investigation into the charges outlined in the PCA against Governor DeWine.
“…John Becker, an ‘archconservative’ former state lawmaker from the Cincinnati area…” as described by Cleveland.com (February 2021). “[State Rep. John Becker,] one of Ohio’s most conservative lawmakers…” proclaimed Cleveland.com (October 2020). “Clermont County State Rep. John Becker, one of the most conservative members of the Ohio House…” according to Cleveland.com (August 2019). Becker wins “Sponsor of Liberty” award by the Republican Liberty Caucus of Ohio (October 2018). “Becker has a legitimate claim as the state’s most conservative legislator,” according to The [Cleveland] Plain Dealer (September 2017). “Rep. John Becker, suburban Cincinnati Republican… [holds] the unofficial title as the General Assembly’s most conservative lawmaker,” proclaimed the Columbus Dispatch (September 2015). Becker wins prestigious William Wilberforce Leadership Award (April 2015). “GOP Ohio House freshman Becker is no shrinking violet,” headlined the Columbus Dispatch (December 2014). “Becker…is arguably the most conservative member of the Ohio House,” said The Cincinnati Enquirer (January 2014). Ranked as a top tier “most archconservative” by the Columbus Dispatch (September 2013).
Did this newsletter get sent to you by someone other than me? If so, please let me know at John@BeckerGOP.com and I will add you to my distribution list. That will ensure that you get it in a timelier manner. You may also forward this to your friends. Let me know if you would like to unsubscribe. This issue and back issues are available at: www.BeckerGOP.com.
Disclaimer Nothing in this newsletter constitutes legal advice. I am not an attorney and do not play one on TV. This newsletter is not sanctioned by the GOP, ORP, or any organization, or affiliation. Much of it is simply my opinion. I am fully and solely responsible for my opinion. Although I strive for accuracy, this is not “The Gospel according to John.” Additionally, I don’t necessarily try to be “fair and balanced.” After all, I didn’t get into politics to be a news reporter. My agenda is to influence public policy consistent with Southern Ohio conservative values. For more information on my motivations or how to get involved, see: What is a Central Committee?
Bob Paduchik won the election to become Chairman of the Ohio Republican Party. He earned the support of a large majority of the 66 members of the State Central Committee. I had a full week to reach out to those 66 members and solicit their vote for a grassroots Trump Republican. I had a lot of very good conversations. Although one or two were a bit contentious, all were polite and courteous. That speaks to the professionalism of the organization. The acting chairman and staff were always attentive to my requests for information. Although I would have preferred a public Q&A between Mr. Paduchik and me, I can’t imagine how the process could have been any more open, transparent, or fair. I was given the opportunity and I came up short. I did my best and have no regrets or complaints. I’d also like to thank the many supporters who reached out to the members of the committee on my behalf. Your voices were heard and counted. Your actions were truly an organic grassroots effort. I am impressed and thankful for your support.
Generally speaking, would you say that things in Ohio are heading in the right direction or are they off on the wrong track?
Wrong track was selected by 72 percent of Ohio’s registered Republicans.
Do you approve or disapprove of the job Mike DeWine is doing as governor?
Disapprove was selected by 75 percent.
Do you approve or disapprove of the way Mike DeWine is responding to the coronavirus?
Disapprove was selected by 78 percent.
Do you believe Mike DeWine’s stay-at-home orders and restrictions on businesses are effective at preventing the spread of coronavirus?
Disapprove was selected by 85 percent.
Do you approve or disapprove of the way Mike DeWine is handling Ohio’s economy?
Disapprove was selected by 76 percent.
How confident are you in Mike DeWine’s ability to lead Ohio toward economic recovery?
Very not confident was selected by 66 percent.
Somewhat not confident was selected by an additional 14 percent.
Rush Limbaugh
It was during the Gulf War in 1990 that I became a fan of AM radio. That was also the same time that I began listening to Rush Limbaugh and other conservative talk radio hosts. It was refreshing and affirming to listen to somebody who thought the same way I did. I bought his books and his ties and remained a Rush Limbaugh fan through the very end. He is and will continue to be missed by millions. RIP, Rush Limbaugh.
Private Citizen Affidavits (PCAs)
The September and October 2020 editions of The Becker Report explains much of the detail. The 25 counties that I know of where PCAs have been filed or delivered per ORC 2935.09(D) are: Adams, Allen, Ashtabula, Belmont. Brown, Butler, Clermont, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Highland, Lake, Licking, Lorain, Marion, Miami, Montgomery, Pickaway, Richland, Summit, Union, Warren, Washington, and Wood Counties. Only 63 more to go! The purpose of these is to seek out a judge or prosecutor willing to perform his clear legal duty as described in ORC 2935.10(A) and either issue an arrest warrant or launch an investigation into the charges outlined in the PCA against Governor DeWine.
March 1, 2021 Union Township GOP meeting at the Union Twp Civic Center at 7 PM.
March 17, 2021 Clermont County GOP meeting at Norlyn Manor in Batavia at 7 PM.
Becker – Vetted, Tested, and Proven!
“…John Becker, an ‘archconservative’ former state lawmaker from the Cincinnati area…” as described by Cleveland.com (February 2021). “[State Rep. John Becker,] one of Ohio’s most conservative lawmakers…” proclaimed Cleveland.com (October 2020). “Clermont County State Rep. John Becker, one of the most conservative members of the Ohio House…” according to Cleveland.com (August 2019). Becker wins “Sponsor of Liberty” award by the Republican Liberty Caucus of Ohio (October 2018). “Becker has a legitimate claim as the state’s most conservative legislator,” according to The [Cleveland] Plain Dealer (September 2017). “Rep. John Becker, suburban Cincinnati Republican… [holds] the unofficial title as the General Assembly’s most conservative lawmaker,” proclaimed the Columbus Dispatch (September 2015). Becker wins prestigious William Wilberforce Leadership Award (April 2015). “GOP Ohio House freshman Becker is no shrinking violet,” headlined the Columbus Dispatch (December 2014). “Becker…is arguably the most conservative member of the Ohio House,” said The Cincinnati Enquirer (January 2014). Ranked as a top tier “most archconservative” by the Columbus Dispatch (September 2013).
Did this newsletter get sent to you by someone other than me? If so, please let me know at John@BeckerGOP.com and I will add you to my distribution list. That will ensure that you get it in a timelier manner. You may also forward this to your friends. Let me know if you would like to unsubscribe. This issue and back issues are available at: www.BeckerGOP.com.
Disclaimer Nothing in this newsletter constitutes legal advice. I am not an attorney and do not play one on TV. This newsletter is not sanctioned by the GOP, ORP, or any organization, or affiliation. Much of it is simply my opinion. I am fully and solely responsible for my opinion. Although I strive for accuracy, this is not “The Gospel according to John.” Additionally, I don’t necessarily try to be “fair and balanced.” After all, I didn’t get into politics to be a news reporter. My agenda is to influence public policy consistent with Southern Ohio conservative values. For more information on my motivations or how to get involved, see: What is a Central Committee?
I voted for Senator Cruz in the 2016 Primary election. A few months later it came down to Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton. I’ve been a Trump guy ever since Senator Cruz conceded. That was a no-brainer.
It’s easy to find reasons to like President Trump
Trump has been awesome at promoting Pro-Life judges and fighting planned Parenthood. Intentional abortion (killing innocent human beings) is an evil that must be defeated.
He made very good and substantive changes to the tax code and eliminated the mandate to force people to purchase healthcare insurance against their will.
Trump’s economic policy has been hugely successful and we are now energy independent for the first time in my lifetime.
His foreign policy has also been hugely successful with peace treaties in the middle east and renegotiating trade deals to put America first.
Trump took on the establishment to drain the swamp. He connected with regular people and spoke our language. Fortunately, he was no Mitt Romney or John McCain. But he wasn’t as smooth or charismatic as Ronald Reagan either.
Although he was technically a politician, he could be better described as the anti-politician. He had and continues to enjoy the loyal following of millions.
I’m saddened that America’s unprecedented success due to Trump’s policies is beginning to change.
Nobody’s Perfect
There is certainly room for criticism of Trump. His personal life prior to becoming president reminded me of when Bill Clinton was president and performed his sins in the Whitehouse. (But according to the Democrats, “character doesn’t matter.”) Trump is not a constitutionalist and has been recklessly deepening the national debt. The day of reckoning gets closer every day. The end is near. I just keep hoping that the fiscal collapse doesn’t occur in my or my children’s lifetime. We’ll see.
Impeached Again? Really?
As if the first impeachment wasn’t dubious enough, the second impeachment (without any hearings) further discounts the first one. I’m looking forward to the Senate trial and the contents of Trump’s speech used against him: “We want to be so respectful of everybody, including bad people.” “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”
Under the topic of “elections have consequences,” the Biden administration has moved quickly to:
Destroy American jobs (Keystone Pipeline).
Threaten national security.
Roll back energy independence.
Open the borders to illegal aliens.
Expand Medicaid to more able-bodied adults.
Allow biological men to compete in women’s sports complete with locker room and shower access.
Lola can now serve in the military and the taxpayers have to pay for his/her/whatever sex change operations and hormone treatments.
Use our tax dollars to maximize the killing of innocent human beings awaiting exit from their mother’s birth canal.
Well, I hope as many as possible make it out alive and into loving arms rather than an abortionist’s bloody hands.
Minimum Wage
I suppose an argument could be made that too many people don’t have access to high-end housing and sports cars. It’s a matter of fairness that the minimum wage should be at least $200 per hour. It’s a matter of equity, right? This would go a long way toward the left’s goal of equal outcomes for all. Is $200 too much? Or not enough? Why? How do we know what the correct number is? Perhaps we should set it at zero and let the free-market economy figure out the optimal wage for services rendered? It seems like that would maximize employment and business efficiency.
Private Citizen Affidavits (PCAs)
The September and October 2020 editions of The Becker Report explains much of the detail. The 25 counties that I know of where PCAs have been filed or delivered per ORC 2935.09(D) are: Adams, Allen, Ashtabula, Belmont. Brown, Butler, Clermont, Franklin, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Highland, Lake, Licking, Lorain, Marion, Miami, Montgomery, Pickaway, Richland, Summit, Union, Warren, Washington, and Wood Counties. Only 63 more to go! The purpose of these is to seek out a judge or prosecutor willing to perform his clear legal duty as described in ORC 2935.10(A) and either issue an arrest warrant or launch an investigation into the charges outlined in the PCA against Governor DeWine.
Washington County – Marietta
Some of you had inquired about a potential charge or cost for filing a Private Citizen Affidavit (PCA). Initially, I had that same concern. My attorney assured me that case law would protect the citizens in the eight SW Ohio counties that comprise of the 12th District Court of Appeals, but there was no guarantee for the rest of the state. He was correct. As these PCAs were getting filed throughout Ohio, I had repeatedly told people that there were no guarantees, but I had not heard of anybody getting charged any kind of fee for properly filing a criminal affidavit as allowed under Ohio law. All of that was true until Washington County came to my attention. One of their citizens properly filed a criminal PCA, per ORC 2935.09(D), with the Washington County Clerk of Courts. The Clerk improperly processed the criminal PCA through civil court and the judge illegally dismissed it without an investigation per the requirements of ORC 2935.10(A). Worse than that, the citizen is now the victim of the court’s improper actions. The victim received a bill for court costs for $192.90. WTH? The victim reached out to me and then I contacted my attorney. Based on his guidance, I reached out to the Washington County Clerk of Courts and their prosecutor’s office via email. Our communications were prompt, polite, and professional. However, at the end of the day I was told that the situation is what it is and if the victim doesn’t like it, the victim should spend thousands of dollars to hire an attorney and fight Washington County in court. The victim doesn’t have the resources to fight them and I found it tempting to personally finance the effort to seek justice. Prudence prevailed and I simply issued a personal check to the victim for $192.90. Just for the record here, the victim did not ask, nor expected me to do that. I volunteered it because I don’t like to see people get screwed. That said, I’m not promising that I’ll do that for anybody else. I’m telling this story to let people know that it is imperative that criminal PCAs get processed through criminal court. If the Clerk of Courts refuses to process it properly, then take it directly to the prosecutor’s office. Don’t be a victim.
Clermont County Republican Party Resolution
The Clermont County Republican Party passed a resolution (sponsored by Chris Hicks) asking the Ohio Republican Party to not endorse in the 2022 primary election, but rather to support a free and open primary election. Although much of the discussion focused on Governor DeWine, the resolution was written broadly to include all offices. It is as follows:
A resolution MAY 2022 PRIMARY AND THE OHIO REPUBLICAN PARTY WHEREAS, on January 15, 2021, at a meeting of the Ohio Republican Party, Ohio Republican Party Chair Jane Timken alluded to supporting incumbents; WHEREAS we believe in the need for a fair Republican Primary in 2022 that allows fair consideration of alternatives to all incumbent candidates; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Clermont County Republican Party calls on the Ohio Republican Party and Chair Timken to support and defend a free and open Republican Primary for all offices that puts voters and their county party first, not Columbus insiders, first; THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that we call on the Ohio Republican Party to not issue candidate endorsements in the 2022 Primary. • Considered and approved by the Clermont County Republican Central Committee on January 20, 2021. • Motioned by: Nathan Schuler (Tate Township D). • Seconded by: Magda Dawson (Union Township Y). • For: 39 (73%) / Opposed 11 (21%) / Non-voting 3 (6%)
February 3, 2021 Union Township GOP meeting at Norlyn Manor in Batavia at 7 PM.
Becker – Vetted, Tested, and Proven!
“[State Rep. John Becker,] one of Ohio’s most conservative lawmakers…” proclaimed Cleveland.com (October 2020). “Clermont County State Rep. John Becker, one of the most conservative members of the Ohio House…” according to Cleveland.com (August 2019). Becker wins “Sponsor of Liberty” award by the Republican Liberty Caucus of Ohio (October 2018). “Becker has a legitimate claim as the state’s most conservative legislator,” according to The [Cleveland] Plain Dealer (September 2017). “Rep. John Becker, suburban Cincinnati Republican… [holds] the unofficial title as the General Assembly’s most conservative lawmaker,” proclaimed the Columbus Dispatch (September 2015). Becker wins prestigious William Wilberforce Leadership Award (April 2015). “GOP Ohio House freshman Becker is no shrinking violet,” headlined the Columbus Dispatch (December 2014). “Becker…is arguably the most conservative member of the Ohio House,” said The Cincinnati Enquirer (January 2014). Ranked as a top tier “most archconservative” by the Columbus Dispatch (September 2013).
Did this newsletter get sent to you by someone other than me? If so, please let me know at John@BeckerGOP.com and I will add you to my distribution list. That will ensure that you get it in a timelier manner. You may also forward this to your friends. Let me know if you would like to unsubscribe. This issue and back issues are available at: www.BeckerGOP.com.
Disclaimer Nothing in this newsletter constitutes legal advice. I am not an attorney and do not play one on TV. This newsletter is not sanctioned by the GOP, ORP, or any organization, or affiliation. Much of it is simply my opinion. I am fully and solely responsible for my opinion. Although I strive for accuracy, this is not “The Gospel according to John.” Additionally, I don’t necessarily try to be “fair and balanced.” After all, I didn’t get into politics to be a news reporter. My agenda is to influence public policy consistent with Southern Ohio conservative values. For more information on my motivations or how to get involved, see: What is a Central Committee?
I’m asking for your help to payoff $20,000 of campaign debt and to prepare for my next run for office in 2021 or 2022. Please send a generous contribution to: Friends of Becker 925 Locust Ln. Cincinnati, OH 45245-1313
As many of you know, I am in my 8th and final year in the Ohio House of Representatives (term limits). During lame-duck sessions, all outgoing members are invited to address the House. One or more members sing the praises of the outgoing member and it ends with a standing ovation. Very nice.
I declined the invitation. My reasons are simple: I didn’t go to Columbus to be treated like royalty, to be honored by colleagues, or the lobbyists seeking to rent me for eight years. I went to Columbus to defend, support, and promote the Christian conservative values of Southern Ohio. And I did that to the best of my ability.
It has never been about me. It’s always been about principled conservatism.
Many establishment Republicans, both in Columbus and Batavia, will be happy to see me go. Trying to work with a principled conservative is difficult when the agenda is higher spending, higher taxes, and watered-down conservative legislation. I never went along with any of that; hence the reason they’re looking forward to my last day.
I can’t say that I’m going to miss Columbus. I’ll continue to have hope for my few principled conservative colleagues who will continue to serve in a small minority. Hopefully, some of the new members starting in January will have what it takes to be part of the conservative coalition. Historically, we’re lovingly known as the “Caveman Caucus.” That’s what I will miss. (We’re similar to the “Freedom Caucus” in Washington DC.)
Good Riddance
Although I’ve worked with the establishment where I could, I’ve often been a thorn in their side. From 2004 through 2012, I was a member of the Republican State Central Committee. I was known for standing up at meetings to preach the conservative doctrine. My claim to fame was that I was the only member of the state committee, in the history of the Ohio GOP, to ever vote NO on Bob Bennet for Chairman. He respected me for that. Nobody else had the nads to stand up to him. He and I got along quite well after that. Bob was a good man.
From 2013 through 2020, I was consistently recognized by the media and my colleagues as one of the most conservative members of the Ohio House of Representatives. During budget caucus meetings, I would challenge my colleagues to be fiscal conservatives and support a fiscally restrained budget. One year, I set the example by creating the “Becker Budget.” I held spending increases to the inflation rate, eliminated Medicaid expansion, and phased out the income tax over five years. It went nowhere of course, but it demonstrated a reasonable and very doable approach to controlling the growth in spending. Out of four operating budgets over eight years, I only voted for one of them. It was the most fiscally restrained.
Regarding the Batavia establishment, I’ve been fighting with them off and on since 1993. Judeo-Christian conservative values have never exactly been “job-one.” You might recall earlier this year that I went public with the corruption in the Clermont County Republican Party. Fortunately, the problem is not cultural but limited to one or two individuals at the very top of Party leadership. Therefore, I’ll continue to be a thorn in their side for at least until we hold new elections in 2022. I’m confident that the Party will get back on the right track.
And thinking back to 1993, some of you might recall that it was Bill Clinton who motivated me to get involved politically. When he became president-elect in 1992, I knew that I had to do more than just vote. The rest is history.
Private Citizen Affidavits (PCAs)
The September and October 2020 editions of The Becker Report explains much of the detail. The 23 counties that I know of where PCAs have been filed or delivered are: Adams, Allen, Ashtabula, Belmont. Brown, Clermont, Franklin, Greene, Hancock, Highland, Lake, Licking, Lorain, Marion, Miami, Montgomery, Pickaway, Richland, Summit, Union, Warren, Washington, and Wood Counties. Only 65 more to go! The purpose of these is to seek out a judge or prosecutor willing to perform his clear legal duty as described in ORC 2935.10(A) and either issue an arrest warrant or launch an investigation into the charges outlined in the PCA against Governor DeWine.
The Ohio General Assembly Failed the People
As predicted, the Senate dropped the ball (again) and failed to vote to override the governor’s veto of SB 311. Most stunning was how the Senate attempted to blame the House for the Senate’s inaction. Incredible! Furthermore, the House dropped the ball and failed to hold impeachment hearings on the 12 articles of impeachment against Governor DeWine that were filed in November. Other than some meaningless “feel good” legislation, the Ohio General Assembly failed to perform our oversight duties and have decided to continue allowing Governor DeWine to reign as an imperial “governor gone wild.” Due to the General Assembly’s failure to act, businesses and the people will continue to be bullied and harassed by the Division of Liquor Control, the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, the Ohio Department of Health, and by any additional government agencies that Governor DeWine chooses to weaponize. Ohio’s 133rd General Assembly has come to an end without supporting the rule of law, the separation of powers doctrine, or the concept of a constitutional republic. The liberty loving people of Ohio are very disappointed with our results.
Becker Bills in the Ohio House of Representatives
HR 55 – Build the Wall. This resolution urging congress to fund a physical barrier across the southern border has been assigned to the Transportation Committee and has had one hearing. HB 39 – Replica Vehicles. John Patterson asked me to do this bipartisan bill with him. It creates a special category for these unique vehicles. It is in the Transportation Committee. HB 153 – Working Officials Requirements Key (WORK) Act. This bill requires county elected officials to show up at their office at least five times every 30 days. It is in the State and Local Government Committee and has had two hearings. HB 176 – Convention and Visitors’ Bureaus. This is a bill I’m doing with Tom Brinkman. It requires open records. HB 182 – Abortion Insurance Coverage. The bill stops insurance companies from paying for abortions. It does not apply to self-insured private companies nor does it prevent any company from directly contracting with an abortionist. It has been assigned to the Insurance Committee and has had its first hearing. HB 219 – Sunday Alcohol, Liquor, and Especially Spirits Act (SALES). I’m doing this bill with Representative Jim Hoops. In short, HB 219 removes the Sunday option. All businesses currently allowed to sell alcohol during the week will also be allowed Sunday sales. Voters retain the option to vote their precinct dry. It has been incorporated into HB 674 and requires no further action. HB 389 – Allows nonprofit organizations to give away alcohol for fundraising purposes. John Rogers reached out to me to do this bipartisan bill. It simply legalizes the common practice of churches raffling off booze at fundraisers. HB 505 – Restores local control for zoning authority of halfway houses. This is a bipartisan bill. Representative Crossman asked to be part of it. HB 538 – Human Life Protection Act – Upon the reversal of Roe v. Wade, Ohio becomes a pro-life state. HB 618 – Need Ohio Working – (NOW) – This bill reopens Ohio for business and prevents the abuse of power from happening again. It has been assigned to the State and Local Government committee. HB 674 – Revises alcohol laws. Representative Brett Hillyer and I teamed up to get this passed. The bill incorporates HB 219 (SALES) and other reforms. It is awaiting the governor’s signature. HB 753 – Creates a new negligent assault offense. This bill is named “Parker’s Law” and is for a little boy that was injured by an adult.
Note that all dates, times, and locations are subject to change.
January 11, 2021 Union Township GOP meeting Norlyn Manor in Batavia at 7 PM.
January 20, 2021 Clermont County GOP meeting at Norlyn Manor in Batavia at 7 PM.
Becker – Vetted, Tested, and Proven!
“[State Rep. John Becker,] one of Ohio’s most conservative lawmakers…” proclaimed Cleveland.com (October 2020). “Clermont County State Rep. John Becker, one of the most conservative members of the Ohio House…” according to Cleveland.com (August 2019). Becker wins “Sponsor of Liberty” award by the Republican Liberty Caucus of Ohio (October 2018). “Becker has a legitimate claim as the state’s most conservative legislator,” according to The [Cleveland] Plain Dealer (September 2017). “Rep. John Becker, suburban Cincinnati Republican… [holds] the unofficial title as the General Assembly’s most conservative lawmaker,” proclaimed the Columbus Dispatch (September 2015). Becker wins prestigious William Wilberforce Leadership Award (April 2015). “GOP Ohio House freshman Becker is no shrinking violet,” headlined the Columbus Dispatch (December 2014). “Becker…is arguably the most conservative member of the Ohio House,” said The Cincinnati Enquirer (January 2014). Ranked as a top tier “most archconservative” by the Columbus Dispatch (September 2013).
Did this newsletter get sent to you by someone other than me? If so, please let me know at John@BeckerGOP.com and I will add you to my distribution list. That will ensure that you get it in a timelier manner. You may also forward this to your friends. Let me know if you would like to unsubscribe. This issue and back issues are available at: www.BeckerGOP.com.
Disclaimer Nothing in this newsletter constitutes legal advice. I am not an attorney and do not play one on TV. This newsletter is not sanctioned by the GOP, ORP, or any organization, or affiliation. Much of it is simply my opinion. I am fully and solely responsible for my opinion. Although I strive for accuracy, this is not “The Gospel according to John.” Additionally, I don’t necessarily try to be “fair and balanced.” After all, I didn’t get into politics to be a news reporter. My agenda is to influence public policy consistent with Southern Ohio conservative values. For more information on my motivations or how to get involved, see: What is a Central Committee?
As you may know, I’ve been leading the effort to impeach Governor DeWine and to restore the rule of law. To that end, 12 articles of impeachment have now been officially filed with the Ohio House Clerk. Joining me as co-sponsors are Representatives Keller, Vitale, and Zeltwanger. Additionally, I’ve asked Speaker Cupp to assign the articles to my Federalism Committee. As chairman, my plan is to have two hearings and then advance it to the House floor for a final vote to send to the Senate for trial.
Senate Bill 311
SB 311 passed the Senate and the House. It is awaiting Governor DeWine’s promised veto. It has two key provisions:
Prohibits the Department of Health (ODH) from issuing a general, mandatory statewide or regional quarantine or isolation order that applies to and is enforced against individuals who have not been either directly exposed to or medically diagnosed with the disease that is the subject of the order.
Allows the General Assembly to adopt a concurrent resolution to rescind certain ODH orders or rules for preventing the spread of contagious or infectious diseases.
SB 311 is good legislation and a great start. But it doesn’t go far enough. The bill does not address Governor DeWine’s weaponing of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation and the Division of Liquor Control. SB 311 is limited to the ODH and doesn’t address potential abuses by local health departments. Regardless, what will happen when the Governor vetoes the bill? It would go back to the Senate for action. The Senate has failed to act on SB 1 and SB 55. Based on that history, I won’t be surprised if the Senate fails to act on SB 311 as well.
House Bill 618 – Need Ohio Working (NOW) Act
In a sentence, HB 618 reduces Governor DeWine’s Covid orders to advisory, rather than under penalty of 90 days in jail and a fine of $750, unless the General Assembly approves the orders. The bill has 12 co-sponsors and had its last hearing on November 17th in the State and Local Government Committee. Nearly 100 people submitted written or in-person support at that hearing. That’s huge! I’m drafting an amendment that does three things:
Specifies that General Assembly approval is by concurrent resolution. That means a simple up or down vote by the House and Senate.
Adds language that in addition to the Governor’s orders, no state agency shall carry out those orders without General Assembly concurrent approval. This addresses the “whack-a-Mole” game that the Governor has been playing by weaponizing the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation and the Division of Liquor Control.
Reduces the penalties that can be imposed by the ODH and the local health departments to a warning on the first offense and $100 per offense thereafter.
Additionally, I have two more amendments I’m considering:
No state agency, board, officer, official, or local subdivision (including k-12 public schools and public colleges and universities) shall issue a general, mandatory statewide, regional, or local order requiring face coverings that applies to and is enforced against individuals who have not been either directly exposed to or medically diagnosed with and is considered to be at a high or moderate risk of transmitting the disease that is the subject of the order.
No state agency, board, officer, official, or local subdivision (including k-12 public schools and public colleges and universities) shall issue a general, mandatory statewide, regional, or local order requiring a vaccine for COVID-19.
Chairman Wiggam supports the bill and wants to vote it out provided that a majority of the committee members support the bill. You could help by reaching out to the members listed below. The position of the following Republicans is either unknown or they are undecided. I’ve personally reached out to each one. They are: Representative Ginter: Rep05@OhioHouse.gov Representative Greenspan: Rep16@OhioHouse.gov Representative Hambley: Rep69@OhioHouse.gov Representative Smith: Rep43@OhioHouse.gov Representative Swearingen: Rep89@OhioHouse.gov Representative Wilkin: Rep91@OhioHouse.gov
Based on their voting records, the below Democrats are likely NO votes: Representative Kelly: Rep31@OhioHouse.gov Representative Kent: Rep25@OhioHouse.gov Representative Russo: Rep24@OhioHouse.gov Representative Skindell: Rep13@OhioHouse.gov Representative Sobecki: Rep45@OhioHouse.gov Representative Strahorn: Rep39@OhioHouse.gov
Private Citizen Affidavits (PCAs)
The September and October 2020 editions of The Becker Report explains much of the detail. The 20 counties that I know of where PCAs have been filed or delivered are: Adams, Allen, Ashtabula, Brown, Clermont, Franklin, Greene, Hancock, Highland, Lake, Lorain, Marion, Miami, Montgomery, Pickaway, Richland, Summit, Union, Warren, and Wood Counties. Only 68 more to go!
Becker Bills in the Ohio House of Representatives
HR 55 – Build the Wall. This resolution urging congress to fund a physical barrier across the southern border has been assigned to the Transportation Committee and has had one hearing. HB 39 – Replica Vehicles. John Patterson asked me to do this bipartisan bill with him. It creates a special category for these unique vehicles. It is in the Transportation Committee. HB 153 – Working Officials Requirements Key (WORK) Act. This bill requires county elected officials to show up at their office at least five times every 30 days. It is in the State and Local Government Committee and has had two hearings. HB 176 – Convention and Visitors’ Bureaus. This is a bill I’m doing with Tom Brinkman. It requires open records. HB 182 – Abortion Insurance Coverage. The bill stops insurance companies from paying for abortions. It does not apply to self-insured private companies nor does it prevent any company from directly contracting with an abortionist. It has been assigned to the Insurance Committee and has had its first hearing. HB 219 – Sunday Alcohol, Liquor, and Especially Spirits Act (SALES). I’m doing this bill with Representative Jim Hoops. In short, HB 219 removes the Sunday option. All businesses currently allowed to sell alcohol during the week will also be allowed Sunday sales. Voters retain the option to vote their precinct dry. It has been incorporated into HB 674 and requires no further action. HB 389 – Allows nonprofit organizations to give away alcohol for fundraising purposes. John Rogers reached out to me to do this bipartisan bill. It simply legalizes the common practice of churches raffling off booze at fundraisers. HB 505 – Restores local control for zoning authority of halfway houses. This is a bipartisan bill. Representative Crossman asked to be part of it. HB 538 – Human Life Protection Act – Upon the reversal of Roe v. Wade, Ohio becomes a pro-life state. HB 618 – Need Ohio Working – (NOW) – This bill reopens Ohio for business and prevents the abuse of power from happening again. It has been assigned to the State and Local Government committee. HB 674 – Revises alcohol laws. Brett Hillyer and I teamed up to get this passed. The bill incorporates HB 219 (SALES) and other reforms. It passed the Ohio House and was referred to the Senate Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources, chaired by Sen. Frank Hoagland. HB 753 – Creates a new negligent assault offense. This bill is named “Parker’s Law” and is for a little boy that was injured by an adult.
Note that all dates, times, and locations are subject to change.
December 7, 2020 Union Township GOP meeting Norlyn Manor at 7 PM.
December 25, 2020 Merry Christmas!
Becker – Vetted, Tested, and Proven!
“Clermont County State Rep. John Becker, one of the most conservative members of the Ohio House…” according to Cleveland.com (August 2019). Becker wins “Sponsor of Liberty” award by the Republican Liberty Caucus of Ohio (October 2018). “Becker has a legitimate claim as the state’s most conservative legislator,” according to The [Cleveland] Plain Dealer (September 2017). “Rep. John Becker, suburban Cincinnati Republican… [holds] the unofficial title as the General Assembly’s most conservative lawmaker,” proclaimed the Columbus Dispatch (September 2015). Becker wins prestigious William Wilberforce Leadership Award (April 2015). “GOP Ohio House freshman Becker is no shrinking violet,” headlined the Columbus Dispatch (December 2014). “Becker…is arguably the most conservative member of the Ohio House,” said The Cincinnati Enquirer (January 2014). Ranked as a top tier “most archconservative” by the Columbus Dispatch (September 2013).
Did this newsletter get sent to you by someone other than me? If so, please let me know at John@BeckerGOP.com and I will add you to my distribution list. That will ensure that you get it in a timelier manner. You may also forward this to your friends. Let me know if you would like to unsubscribe. This issue and back issues are available at: www.BeckerGOP.com.
Disclaimer Nothing in this newsletter constitutes legal advice. I am not an attorney and do not play one on TV. This newsletter is not sanctioned by the GOP, ORP, or any organization, or affiliation. Much of it is simply my opinion. I am fully and solely responsible for my opinion. Although I strive for accuracy, this is not “The Gospel according to John.” Additionally, I don’t necessarily try to be “fair and balanced.” After all, I didn’t get into politics to be a news reporter. My agenda is to influence public policy consistent with Southern Ohio conservative values. For more information on my motivations or how to get involved, see: What is a Central Committee?
Absurd, Ridiculous, Laughable – “Pounding the Table”
Words like absurd, ridiculous, and laughable, are being used by Governor DeWine’s supporters, and some in the media, to describe my Private Citizen Affidavit (PCA) outlining 10 criminal violations against Governor DeWine. It’s interesting to note that nobody has attempted to defend the governor on any of the allegations – just non-substantive ridicule. My attorney told me that, “When you have the facts on your side, you pound the facts. When you have the law on your side, you pound the law. When you have neither on your side, you pound the table.” Well, Governor DeWine’s supporters have been doing a lot of table pounding. (The details and more information on the PCA is in the September issue of The Becker Report.)
Let’s examine the arguments in the PCA and you decide which ones, if any, are absurd, ridiculous, or laughable. Although the seven felonies are listed first, they are ranked by logical argument rather than greatest punishment. The three misdemeanors follow.
First Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine has intimidated or coerced the people of Ohio? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine has intimidated, coerced, and promoted fear in multiple ways including but not limited to required social distancing, emphasizing the reporting of irrelevant cumulative Covid cases, color-coded metrics emphasizing “red” areas, and the mandate to wear face coverings, interfering with the freedom to worship, freedom to shop, the availability of sports, and the reopening of in-person instruction, etcetera? Isn’t it true that Ohio Revised Code (ORC) 2909.24(A)(1) states that [No person shall] “intimidate or coerce a civilian population”? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine is in clear violation of ORC 2909.24? Isn’t it true that ORC 2909.24 is Ohio’s “Terrorism” statute? Isn’t it true that probable cause exists for the crime of terrorism under ORC 2909.24(A)(1)?
Second Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine has threatened to intimidate, coerce, and promote fear in the people of Ohio? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine has repeatedly, recklessly, and flagrantly, threatened, intimidated and coerced Ohio’s citizens, businesses, healthcare facilities, churches, schools, and operators of voting locations, et al with closure and restrictions to their business models and operations? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine has repeatedly and flagrantly threatened criminal prosecution of a second-degree misdemeanor carrying a ninety-day jail sentence and/or a fine of $750 for violating his “orders”? Isn’t it true that ORC 2909.23(A)(1)(a) states that [No person shall threaten to] “intimidate or coerce a civilian population” and “cause a reasonable expectation or fear of the imminent commission of the specified offense”? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine is in clear violation of ORC 2909.23? Isn’t it true that ORC 2909.23 is Ohio’s “Making Terroristic Threat” statute? Isn’t it true that probable cause exists for the crime of making a terroristic threat under ORC 2909.23(A)(1)(a)?
Third Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine has engaged in a pattern of intimidation and coercion? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine has committed multiple violations of intimidation, coercion, and promoting fear as described above? Isn’t it true that ORC 2923.31(I)(2)(a) states that [Engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity is conduct constituting] “a violation of …2909.23 and 2909.24…” Isn’t it true that ORC 2909.23 and 2909.24 includes the offenses of intimidation, coercion, and fear? Isn’t it true that ORC 2909.23 and 2909.24 are Ohio’s terrorism and making terroristic threat statutes? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine is in clear violation of ORC 2923.31? Isn’t it true that ORC 2923.31 is Ohio’s “Engaging in Pattern of Corrupt Activity” statute? Isn’t it true that probable cause exists for the crime of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity under ORC 2923.31(I)(2)(a)?
Fourth Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine has solicited or procured another to commit a crime? Isn’t it true that, per the above statutes, Governor DeWine has “solicited and procured” to commit the offense of “engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity,” et al, by conspiring with his cabinet-level officials such as the Department of Health and the Department of Commerce, Division of Liquor Control as well as the Ohio Secretary of State and hospital administrators, et al, to promote fear, threaten business licenses, shutter businesses, and illegally cancel an election, etcetera? Isn’t it true that ORC 2923.03(A)(1) states that [No person shall] “solicit or procure another to commit the offense”? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine is in clear violation of ORC 2923.03? Isn’t it true that ORC 2923.03 is Ohio’s “Complicity” statute? Isn’t it true that probable cause exists for the crime of complicity under ORC 2923.03(A)(1)?
Fifth Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine has caused serious public inconvenience or alarm? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine caused serious public inconvenience or alarm when he illegally cancelled the March 17, 2020 primary election, reported outlandish Covid numbers, mandated face coverings, shut down healthcare facilities to nonessential procedures, and shut down or placed onerous restrictions upon retail establishments, bars, restaurants, etcetera? Isn’t it true that ORC 2917.31(A)(3) states that [No person shall] “commit any offense, with reckless disregard of the likelihood that its commission will cause serious public inconvenience or alarm”? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine is in clear violation of ORC 2917.31? Isn’t it true that ORC 2917.31 is Ohio’s “Inducing Panic” law? Isn’t it true that probable cause exists for the crime of inducing panic under ORC 2917.31(A)(3)?
Sixth Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine conspired with others to engage in a pattern of intimidation, coercion, and promoting fear? Isn’t it true that ORC 2923.01(A)(1) states that [No person, with purpose to commit or to promote or facilitate] “with another person or persons, plan or aid in planning the commission of [engagement in a pattern of corrupt activity]? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine is in clear violation of ORC 2923.01? Isn’t it true that ORC 2923.01 is Ohio’s “Conspiracy” statute? Isn’t it true that probable cause exists for the crime of conspiracy under ORC 2923.01(A)(1)?
Seventh Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine cancelled the March 17, 2020 primary election and barred people from in-person voting? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine intimidated, coerced, or by other unlawful means induced electors [voters] to refrain from voting at a primary election? Isn’t it true that ORC 3599.01(A)(2) states that [No person shall] “attempt by intimidation, coercion, or other unlawful means to induce such delegate or elector [voter] to register or refrain from registering or to vote or refrain from voting at a primary, convention, or election for a particular person, question, or issue”? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine is in clear violation of ORC 3599.01? Isn’t it true that ORC 3599.01 is Ohio’s “Bribery” statute? Isn’t it true that probable cause exists for the crime of bribery under ORC 3599.01(A)(2)?
Eighth Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine interfered with a constitutional or statutory right? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine recklessly and repeatedly violated civil liberties, “constitutional, and statutory rights” by closing healthcare facilities for nonessential procedures in violation of Article I, section 21 (B) and (C) of the Ohio Constitution to obtain healthcare, closing voting locations (tantamount to cancelling the election) in violation of ORC 3501.01(E)(2) as mandated by Article I, Section 4 of the United States Constitution and Article II, Section 27 of the Ohio Constitution and unlawfully placing nearly 12 million Ohioans (effectively) under house arrest and to wear facial coverings, subject to government-approved exceptions, thereby violating millions of Ohioans’ legal freedoms of association and civil liberties and due process rights under threat of credible criminal prosecution of a second-degree misdemeanor carrying a ninety-day jail sentence and/or a fine of $750? Isn’t it true that ORC 2921.45(A) states that, “No public servant, under color of his office, employment, or authority, shall knowingly deprive, or conspire or attempt to deprive any person of a constitutional or statutory right”? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine is in clear violation of ORC 2921.45? Isn’t it true that ORC 2921.45 is Ohio’s Interfering with “Civil Rights” statute? Isn’t it true that probable cause exists for the crime of interfering with civil rights under ORC 2921.45(A)?
Ninth Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine has coerced others? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine illegally, callously, and deliberately, in collusion with others, ordered the closing of healthcare facilities to nonessential procedures, voting locations, bars, et, al and threatened to revoke liquor and other business licenses and under the additional threat of credible criminal prosecution of a second-degree misdemeanor carrying a ninety-day jail sentence and/or a fine of $750? Isn’t it true that ORC 2905.12(A)(5) states that [No person, with purpose to coerce another into taking or refraining from action concerning which the other person has a legal freedom of choice, shall] “take, withhold, or threaten to take or withhold official action, or cause or threaten to cause official action to be taken or withheld”? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine is in clear violation of ORC 2905.12? Isn’t it true that ORC 2905.12 is Ohio’s “Coercion” statute? Isn’t it true that probable cause exists for the crime of coercion under ORC 2905.12(A)(5)?
Tenth Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine has forced the physical separation of loved ones from family members in care facilities? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine promoted fear and demonstrated callous disregard for health and happiness by requiring “neglect against residents or patients of care facilities” by requiring the withholding of the physical love, comfort, and emotional support of family members constituting cruel and unusual punishment? Isn’t it true that ORC 2903.34(A)(3) states that, [No person who owns, operates, or administers, or who is an agent or employee of, a care facility shall] “commit neglect against a resident or patient of the facility”? Isn’t it true that Governor DeWine is in clear violation of ORC 2903.34? Isn’t it true that ORC 2903.34 is Ohio’s “Patient abuse or Neglect” statute? Isn’t it true that probable cause exists for the crime of patient abuse or neglect under ORC 2903.34(A)(3)?
Person having knowledge of offense to file affidavit – official review before complaint filed
ORC 2935.09(D) creates a statutory right for a private citizen to file a “Private Citizen Affidavit (PCA).” “A private citizen having knowledge of the facts who seeks to cause an arrest or prosecution under this section may file an affidavit charging the offense committed with a reviewing official for the purpose of review to determine if a complaint should be filed by the prosecuting attorney or attorney charged by law with the prosecution of offenses in the court or before the magistrate. A private citizen may file an affidavit charging the offense committed with the clerk of a court of record before or after the normal business hours of the reviewing officials if the clerk’s office is open at those times. A clerk who receives an affidavit before or after the normal business hours of the reviewing officials shall forward it to a reviewing official when the reviewing official’s normal business hours resume.”
Filing of affidavit or complaint procedure
In the case of a felony, ORC 2935.10(A) mandates the arrest or investigation of the person charged in the PCA. “Upon the filing of an affidavit or complaint as provided by section 2935.09 of the Revised Code, if it charges the commission of a felony, such judge, clerk, or magistrate, unless he has reason to believe that it was not filed in good faith, or the claim is not meritorious, shall forthwith issue a warrant for the arrest of the person charged in the affidavit, and directed to a peace officer; otherwise he shall forthwith refer the matter to the prosecuting attorney or other attorney charged by law with prosecution for investigation prior to the issuance of warrant.”
Good faith, Meritorious
These words in ORC 2935.10(A) simply mean probable cause. Probable cause is generally defined as a reasonable ground for suspicion supported by facts and circumstances sufficiently strong to warrant a prudent person to believe that an accused person has committed an offense. If the court finds probable cause for at least one of the above felony charges, ORC 2935.10(A) mandates that a warrant for Governor DeWine’s arrest must be issued. It is not discretionary. The basic facts surrounding the above charges are not in dispute and probable cause is self-evident. Therefore, the arrest of Governor DeWine for criminal charges is mandated (based on the facts) per the statute. That said, I can’t imagine a warrant getting issued for Governor DeWine’s arrest regardless of probable cause. At a minimum ORC 2935.10(A) mandates a criminal investigation. That’s why I filed for a writ of mandamus in the 12th District Court of Appeals to have the court order the Clermont County Prosecutor to follow the law. Although filing a PCA is free and does not require an attorney, filing for a writ of mandamus requires a filing fee and an attorney. Plan on spending thousands of dollars if you choose to go there. Freedom isn’t free.
Conclusion
At this point, I expect that it is clear to the reader that nothing in my PCA is absurd, ridiculous, or laughable. Those are the kinds of comments people make when they haven’t a substantive retort. The charges are strong. The evidence is damning. And the facts and the law are on the side of the people. I’ll leave the table pounding to Governor DeWine’s supporters. And speaking of absurd, ridiculous, and laughable, let’s review the clause of the sentence that Governor DeWine has used to seize power. It is in ORC 3701.13. “The department [Ohio Department of Health] may make special or standing orders or rules for preventing the use of fluoroscopes for nonmedical purposes that emit doses of radiation likely to be harmful to any person, for preventing the spread of contagious or infectious diseases, for governing the receipt and conveyance of remains of deceased persons, and for such other sanitary matters as are best controlled by a general rule.”
I rest my case.
Next Steps
The articles of impeachment are still open for additional co-sponsors and can be found at ImpeachDeWine.com. Contact your state representative and ask them to co-sponsor. A Word document for the PCA draft can also be downloaded from the same website. That link is in the blue font on the right side. Just change Clermont County to your county. Change my personal information to your own. Change anything else at your discretion. Get it notarized and file it with a Clerk of Courts in your county.
Review
After I introduced HB 618, Governor DeWine threatened to veto it and all other bills that would curb the power that he has taken. Not having the votes to override vetoes, I drafted an impeachment resolution. It only requires 50 of 99 votes to advance to the Senate, where 2/3 is required for removal from office. Speaker Cupp controls the agenda and effectively vetoed the impeachment approach. Simultaneously, many of my colleagues refused to sign on as co-sponsors because there had been no criminal charges. (Note that criminal charges are not required for impeachment and have never been part of any impeachment proceedings in Ohio.) Therefore, to advance criminal charges, I filed a PCA in Clermont County. So far, PCAs have been filed in 13 counties that I’m aware of. They are Clermont, Miami, Montgomery, Wood, Lake, Richland, Adams, Lorain, Allen, Marion, Union, Brown, and Franklin Counties. Additionally, I’ve had inquiries from citizens in about 40 other counties wanting to do the same.
The Plan
The plan is to continue to get PCAs filed in courts in all 88 counties until a prosecutor decides to take the law seriously and perform his duty required by ORC 2935.10(A). When that happens, I expect that impeachment proceedings will begin and Governor DeWine will resign. (I wish him a long comfortably, happy, and healthy retirement.) Lt. Gov. Husted will take the helm and will either lift the boot of big government off of the throats of the people and reopen the state or suffer the same fate as his predecessor. We’ll see.
Becker Bills in the Ohio House of Representatives
HR 55 – Build the Wall. This resolution urging congress to fund a physical barrier across the southern border has been assigned to the Transportation Committee and has had one hearing. HB 39 – Replica Vehicles. John Patterson asked me to do this bipartisan bill with him. It creates a special category for these unique vehicles. It is in the Transportation Committee. HB 153 – Working Officials Requirements Key (WORK) Act. This bill requires county elected officials to show up at their office at least five times every 30 days. It is in the State and Local Government Committee and has had two hearings. HB 176 – Convention and Visitors’ Bureaus. This is a bill I’m doing with Tom Brinkman. It requires open records. HB 182 – Abortion Insurance Coverage. The bill stops insurance companies from paying for abortions. It does not apply to self-insured private companies nor does it prevent any company from directly contracting with an abortionist. It has been assigned to the Insurance Committee and has had its first hearing. HB 219 – Sunday Alcohol, Liquor, and Especially Spirits Act (SALES). I’m doing this bill with Representative Jim Hoops. In short, HB 219 removes the Sunday option. All businesses currently allowed to sell alcohol during the week will also be allowed Sunday sales. Voters retain the option to vote their precinct dry. It has been incorporated into HB 674 and requires no further action. HB 389 – Allows nonprofit organizations to give away alcohol for fundraising purposes. John Rogers reached out to me to do this bipartisan bill. It simply legalizes the common practice of churches raffling off booze at fundraisers. HB 505 – Restores local control for zoning authority of halfway houses. This is a bipartisan bill. Representative Crossman asked to be part of it. HB 538 – Human Life Protection Act – Upon the reversal of Roe v. Wade, Ohio becomes a pro-life state. HB 618 – Need Ohio Working – (NOW) – This bill reopens Ohio for business and prevents the abuse of power from happening again. It has been assigned to the State and Local Government committee. HB 674 – Revises alcohol laws. Brett Hillyer and I teamed up to get this passed. The bill incorporates HB 219 (SALES) and other reforms. It passed the Ohio House and was referred to the Senate Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources, chaired by Sen. Frank Hoagland. HB 753 – Creates a new negligent assault offense. This bill is named “Parker’s Law” and is for a little boy that was injured by an adult.
Note that all dates, times, and locations are subject to change.
November 2, 2020 Union Township GOP “meeting” at Grammas Pizza to pick up elections materials at 7 PM.
November 3, 2020 Election Day from 6:30 AM to 7:30 PM.
November 18, 2020 Clermont County GOP meeting at Norlyn Manor at 7 PM.
Becker – Vetted, Tested, and Proven!
“Clermont County State Rep. John Becker, one of the most conservative members of the Ohio House…” according to Cleveland.com (August 2019). Becker wins “Sponsor of Liberty” award by the Republican Liberty Caucus of Ohio (October 2018). “Becker has a legitimate claim as the state’s most conservative legislator,” according to The [Cleveland] Plain Dealer (September 2017). “Rep. John Becker, suburban Cincinnati Republican… [holds] the unofficial title as the General Assembly’s most conservative lawmaker,” proclaimed the Columbus Dispatch (September 2015). Becker wins prestigious William Wilberforce Leadership Award (April 2015). “GOP Ohio House freshman Becker is no shrinking violet,” headlined the Columbus Dispatch (December 2014). “Becker…is arguably the most conservative member of the Ohio House,” said The Cincinnati Enquirer (January 2014). Ranked as a top tier “most archconservative” by the Columbus Dispatch (September 2013).
Did this newsletter get sent to you by someone other than me? If so, please let me know at John@BeckerGOP.com and I will add you to my distribution list. That will ensure that you get it in a timelier manner. You may also forward this to your friends. Let me know if you would like to unsubscribe. This issue and back issues are available at: www.BeckerGOP.com.
Disclaimer Nothing in this newsletter constitutes legal advice. I am not an attorney and do not play one on TV. This newsletter is not sanctioned by the GOP, ORP, or any organization, or affiliation. Much of it is simply my opinion. I am fully and solely responsible for my opinion. Although I strive for accuracy, this is not “The Gospel according to John.” Additionally, I don’t necessarily try to be “fair and balanced.” After all, I didn’t get into politics to be a news reporter. My agenda is to influence public policy consistent with Southern Ohio conservative values. For more information on my motivations or how to get involved, see: What is a Central Committee?
